"talk about weasel wording. what are you actually trying to "say.""

Come'on, don't be so hard on him. Our ability to weasel out of stuff is what separates us from the animals (except for the weasel).

Has anybody else here bothered to look into the profile of d'kine? He doesn't have one. All we know about him is that he posts whatever the liberal talking point of the day is, and blames everything on Bush and Reagan. It's the kind of profile that I deny access when they want to join the tribes that I moderate. But I guess the comedy factor is enough to want to let him hang around.

<they tend to be. talk about weasel wording. what are you actually trying to "say." does tend mean 50%? or 10%? and how does this relate to the pond scum that the Democrats wheel into plunk down their vote to extend their wellfare, foodstamps and freeloading?>

don't see any reason to continue posting on this site absent something remotely resembling rational and HONEST debate from the 'right' oriented members. poll methodology? wtf? it was a college project that went out clipboards in hand and asked some questions of a few thousand people. they were astounded to find over fifty percent of self identified republicans who had seen at least one episode of the colbert report considered him a straight up republican savaging the left. i wasn't astounded. anyone that still thought bush was a good president and the republican ideology was still the way to go is probably too fucking stupid to comprehend well done satire. and colbert is VERY well done satire.

anyway, who the fuck needs anything but a modicum of intelligence and common sense to know the far right has the sense of satirical humor of a box of hammers? they're fucking FAMOUS for being satirical humor challenged. part and parcel of that whole sheepbot thing they have going on. there's a reason all the quality humor and satire shows and sites are oriented to liberals.

from YOU i expected some real debate, honesty and rationality, well reasoned points.