Advertisement
Now if they'd only see what a centrist Obama has actually been already....
www.foxnews.com/opinion/20...year-later/
www.foxnews.com/opinion/20...year-later/
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Insanity wearing off?
Thu, November 5, 2009 - 6:05 PM
hatred accomplishes nothing.
left or right, Obama is way to close to organized labor and it's having a very negative result. that and his tendency to advocate a government solution for all of life's problems. other than that, he's every bit as inept and unqualified as the last guy.
-
Re: Insanity wearing off?
Thu, November 5, 2009 - 6:25 PMCentrist?
Surly you jest.
Besides it's not personal it's political.
If Stumbles would see the light and stop trying to take the nation Marxist I'd prolly like the hell out of him.
Well there is that humongous ego he's sporting and then the chip on his shoulder. But other than that he's probably OK.
Nudge me when he turns away from communism. -
-
Re: Insanity wearing off?
Thu, November 5, 2009 - 6:29 PM
>> Centrist? <<
it's pretty inane. he's sided with labor and bigger government with every major decision. he's only considered "centrist" because there is only so much he can get away with... and the fact that the Democrat majority in the house and senate depends upon "moderate" to "conservative" Democrats that can only be pushed so far.
it just seems that the loony left expected everything at once and are throwing a tantrum like they always do. -
-
Re: Insanity wearing off?
Thu, November 5, 2009 - 7:26 PM"it just seems that the loony left expected everything at once and are throwing a tantrum like they always do."
I did find it funny that people expected a democrat to act liberal when given charge of a mixed bag. Half the reason he hasn't done more on his wish list, is that he's been stalled, or that the realities are more complex (and disingenuous) than a simplistic stump speech would indicate. Democrats are not progressive, nor are they in the game for "the people" when those people don't have an open check book. -
-
Re: Insanity wearing off?
Thu, November 5, 2009 - 7:35 PM>> Democrats are not progressive, nor are they in the game for "the people" when those people don't have an open check book. <<
neither side is in it for "the people." just like the choreographed election a couple days ago. three lame Democrats lost and you'd swear the clouds parted and Jesus endorsed the ultra-conservative wing of the Republican party to take back the Christian Kingdom.
there is an inverse relation between intelligence and political fervor. and there is a direct correlation between political fervor and gullibility. and there really ain't jack we can do about it. the real problems and the shit that critically needs to be fixed requires understanding and patience. and the average dunce would rather scream bloody hell over "death panels" or empty promises of hope.
-
-
-
Re: Insanity wearing off?
Thu, November 5, 2009 - 7:23 PM"Nudge me when he turns away from communism."
Howsabout I nudge you to go see the pages written by actual commies who endlessly explain to you types who don't know what it is, that he's clearly not.
Hunt around. use your googlin finger. Its pretty easy.
Try Salon.com, for example. That's the last place I found one. -
-
Re: Insanity wearing off?
Thu, November 5, 2009 - 9:44 PMAs I already posted elsewhere on this Tribe, the leader of the American Communist Party seemed pretty pleased with his election. -
-
Re: Insanity wearing off?
Sat, November 7, 2009 - 2:49 AMNo, you posted about how the guy was happy for America in that moment, not one word about Obama being pro-communist. You found a pro-Obama commie, not Obama pro-commie. HUGE difference. he made NO statement at all about Obama beinga commie, Thatw as all YOU ya hatemongerin' numbnut, -
-
Re: Insanity wearing off?
Sun, November 8, 2009 - 11:30 AMI posted PRECISELY what the leader of the American Communist Party said. Nothing more, nothing less. You gain no knowledge from that, and I take from it what I see in it. That's the difference. Can you name another American President that the Communist Party was glad to see in office? -
-
Re: Insanity wearing off?
Tue, November 10, 2009 - 4:29 PMI didn't think so.
>>>Walks away giggling.<<< -
-
Re: Insanity wearing off?
Tue, November 10, 2009 - 6:13 PMThe leader was not speaking for the whole of the party, only himself, dolt.
You are ravingly paranoid and frighteningly ignorant of what a communist is. Exactly the kind of voter the GOP wants. Bigoted and brainless.
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Insanity wearing off?
Fri, November 6, 2009 - 12:46 PM************Howsabout I nudge you to go see the pages written by actual commies who endlessly explain to you types who don't know what it is, that he's clearly not.**************
That's a red herring if ever I heard one.
First off right out of the gate it presupposes that you can find the "authoritative" opinion on what communism is.
To which I'd say that whatever your friends, the so called experts, say is either self serving tripe on the one hand or self serving tripe on the other.
-
-
Re: Insanity wearing off?
Fri, November 6, 2009 - 6:43 PM>> First off right out of the gate it presupposes that you can find the "authoritative" opinion on what communism is. <<
more flavors than baskin robins. you know there is a problem when something is designed to be as unnecessarily complicated as Gramscianis. or whatever flavor of the month is in vogue. -
-
Re: Insanity wearing off?
Sat, November 7, 2009 - 3:03 AM"more flavors than baskin robins. you know there is a problem when something is designed to be as unnecessarily complicated as Gramscianis. or whatever flavor of the month is in vogue."
Just googled that one. Who the hell writes that shit? Talk about up your own ass with wordiness obfuscating actual meaning. The wiki was insane. All for tawdry comprehensional gains at best it seems like. -
-
Re: Insanity wearing off?
Sat, November 7, 2009 - 12:37 PM>> Who the hell writes that shit? Talk about up your own ass with wordiness obfuscating actual meaning. <<
isn't it great? it's like management-speak. the whole purpose is to make it as unnecessarily complicated and arcane as possible... with lots of filler words and paragraphs of nonsense where everything could be summed up with a sentence or two. the whole point is to appear intellectual by deliberately confusing other people with their big meaningless words. as an aside, always beware the person that pulls this kind of bullshit.
I think Gillian Tett from the Financial Times coined the term "management twaddle." why not "communist twaddle?" or "leftist pseudo-intellectual twaddle?"
-
-
-
Re: Insanity wearing off?
Sat, November 7, 2009 - 2:54 AMwww.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...99.html
www.politicsdaily.com/2009/09...of-them/
www.chicagotribune.com/news/o...1.story
www.humanevents.com/article.php
online.wsj.com/article/SB...091037.html
www.boston.com/bostonglob..._not_quite/
I found these with ONE fucking google search, one the first page of results for "Obama+socialist". Is it your fingers that are broken, or just your brain?
Give it the hell up already. "My friends'? Fuck you. How are your friends the racist nazis, then, ya a-hole?
Get a fucking brain you Beck-worshipping drool-factory reject. How do you not fall down more often? -
-
Re: Insanity wearing off?
Sat, November 7, 2009 - 3:00 AMgawker.com/5304225/glen...nist-dictator
Yes, this is far more reasonable than common sense. Far more. He's catering to the shitheads who are all full of sour grapes and already willing to look like jackasses for the sake of a cheap neener neener. And you people expect any kind of decent response when you fall for this shit like a retard who tied his own shoes together? Gimme a break. Lester, Cliff, price me the cost of a clue. I will buy it for you like a vowel on Vanna. Here's one now, the first one is free.
newsjunkiepost.com/2009/10/...-revival/
I swear its like Scooby Dumb and Scooby Dumber around here some days. Pass me some serious shit, Shaggy, I'm seein' talking dogs again, and they think they comprehend politics.
-
-
Re: Insanity wearing off?
Sat, November 7, 2009 - 3:05 AM"To which I'd say that whatever your friends, the so called experts, say is either self serving tripe on the one hand or self serving tripe on the other."
By that logic, he can never actually be a commie, because there's no such thing as one anyway. Way to negate your own paranoia.
-
-
-
-
Re: Insanity wearing off?
Sat, November 7, 2009 - 8:30 AMWhat I thing you don't see Malvado, is that the further left the left goes the less left it all seems to the people who thinkof themselves as being left.
From the position of one whose politics were not moving either to one side or the other the concept of "center" would be moving further and further left or right all the time depending on who was trying to claim it .
And of course that simple sounding statement is complicated by where in time that "one whose politics were not moving" chose to nail their peg.
Is it the 1920s, the '30s, the '40s, the '50s, the '60s, the '70ss the '80s, etc and from which side of the aisle was that person coming when they drove their "center" nail in?
It's not so easy. And to a great many people statements like the one you made in your top post just seem like a lot of self serving lies.
People who pegged their "center" marker at some other point in history will see the plain falsity of your words while people who pegged their "center" marker as you have will agree with you completely and wonder why those other people have such a problem.
And I rather suspect that it's the left whose steady march off to communism since the 1960s has caused the right to become more hard line and inflexible.
Think of it this way:
TUG-O-WAR
if your team starts pulling really hard then my team has to do likewise.
If your team gets some muscle bound brute to join your ranks then, so does my team have to get a muscle bound brute.
And off into the furthest reaches of extremism go the fringes of each party.
Your team's fringe has embraced the most extreme of Marxism and communism and fascism.
And you - being part of that fringe think it's normal even sort of mildly centrist.
My team' fringe has embraced rabid fundamental Christianity and exclusivity and fascism.
And me - not being part of that extreme - would very much like to offer Ronald Reagan's deepest most heartfelt apologies for stealing the Christians away from the Democrat party and give them back to you guys.
There~!! Now the Christians are yours. You figure out what to do with them.
-
-
Re: Insanity wearing off?
Sat, November 7, 2009 - 12:39 PM>> Your team's fringe has embraced the most extreme of Marxism and communism and fascism.
And you - being part of that fringe think it's normal even sort of mildly centrist. <<
the whole "leftist" thing is just an excuse. it intellectualizes bribes and power grabs which is what we're all about. avoid the labels and the "us-and-them" bullshit and there is a pretty clear middle ground.
-